DemoRead-only · all data on this page is fabricated for demonstration purposes.← Home
Patient feedback

Demo dashboard

A portfolio-facing preview of the admin analytics surface. All responses, trends, comments, and improvement-plan entries below are synthetic.

Updated 09:12 MT
Week of 2026-04-13
Responses · this month
142
+27
vs 115 last month
Avg NPS · this month
8.4
+0.2
12-week trailing 8.2
010
Negative sentiment · this month
11%
−2pp
of analyzed comments
Chart

NPS trend

Last 12 weeks. Weeks with fewer than 5 responses for a clinic are omitted to preserve anonymity.

108647.8 ytd8.401-2602-1603-0903-3004-13
Chart

Topic breakdown

Last 30 days. Bar length is volume; sigil at right shows net sentiment (+ positive, − negative, ◦ mixed).

wait time38
provider communication31 +
staff friendliness27 +
scheduling19
facility14 +
intake paperwork12
billing9
phone experience7
clinical outcome6 +
Table

Per-clinic comparison

This month · n=142
ClinicResponsesAvg NPSOverallStaffProvider comm.Access
Provo528.64.44.64.54.1
Payson318.24.34.54.44.3
Draper248.94.64.74.64.4
Murray218.04.24.44.33.9
Price / Richfield / Roosevelt148.34.34.54.44.0
Open text

Recent comments

Tag sigils: positive +, negative −, mixed ◦.

Provo
04-13
+ positive
provider communication

The provider really listened and took time to explain my options. Left feeling informed.

Murray
04-13
◦ mixed
wait time

The wait in the waiting room was close to an hour. Otherwise the visit went well.

Draper
04-06
+ positive
staff friendliness

Front desk was welcoming and got me checked in quickly. The exam itself was efficient.

Provo
04-06
− negative
scheduling

Scheduling online was confusing — I wasn't sure which appointment type to pick.

Payson
04-06
+ positive
facility

Parking is easy and the waiting area is calm. Appreciated the efficient check-out.

Murray
03-30
◦ mixed
phone experience

Rescheduling over the phone took a few tries to get through. Staff were helpful once connected.

Provo
03-30
− negative
intake paperwork

Intake paperwork felt longer than it needed to be. An online version ahead of time would help.

Draper
03-23
+ positive
provider communication

The follow-up instructions were clear and I knew exactly what to do next.

MIPS artifact

Improvement plans

Each entry ties a problem observed in survey data to an action taken in response. Quarter-level granularity, no patient linkage.

Q1 2026
Practice manager (Provo)
DONE

Observed issue

Multiple Provo survey comments in January cited wait times over 45 minutes on Wednesday and Thursday afternoons. Average wait-time mentions in open-text rose 2.4x vs Q4 2025.

Action taken

Added a floating front-desk shift 1–5pm Wed/Thu. Scheduled 15-minute buffer blocks at 10:00 and 15:00 to absorb overruns. Provider schedules shifted to cap concurrent starts at 3.

Q1 2026
Website admin
DONE

Observed issue

Scheduling-UX negative mentions spiked in late January. 7 comments cited confusion picking the correct appointment type, and a drop in self-scheduled appointments (−18%) suggested patients were abandoning the flow.

Action taken

Simplified appointment-type picker on the public site from 11 options to 4 (routine, new concern, follow-up, surgical consult). Added a one-line description under each option. Relaunched March 4.

Q2 2026
Practice manager (Murray)
IN PROGRESS

Observed issue

Murray Tuesday wait-time mentions up 3x vs prior 4 weeks. NPS at Murray dropped 0.4 points week-over-week. No equivalent pattern in other clinics.

Action taken

Reviewing Tuesday staffing and block schedules. Planning pilot of a triage call 24 hours before Tuesday appointments to catch anything that could be resolved by phone and free up in-person slots.

Q2 2026
Clinic operations lead
OPEN

Observed issue

Intake-paperwork length appeared as a negative theme in 8% of monthly comments across clinics. Several patients suggested digital pre-visit completion.

Action taken

Scoping an online pre-visit intake form. Evaluating EHR vendor options and privacy review for any new data path.